GNER Wifi Update
Well, I said I’d do an update testing the service so here I am – this is written somewhere just north of the Border. This time I’ve paid £4.95 for one hour’s worth of connection… which isn’t such great value.
Firstly, some technical details. The first thing I noticed is that there are actually three seperate WLANs detected: gnerwifi (unsecured and with an excellent connection), and two others, named “EC53FG” and “EC53EF”. Both of these were roughly at half strength, and were “security enabled”. As I’m sitting in the middle of Coach F, I guess there’s one access point at the end of each coach. The naming appears to be as follows: “EC##” being the train set identification number, and the last 2 letters referring to which coaches the access points cover.
You fire up your browser, which is redirected to a payment page. After having handed over your card details, you can click “start” within the browser to start your time allowance. My network details are (currently) as follows:
DNS Suffic: gnerwifi.train
IP Address: 10.101.1.217
Subnet: 255.255.240.0
Gateway, DHCP and DNS Servers: 10.101.0.1
Anyhow, to return to my earlier commments about the speed of the service. On closer examination, I can see “gnerwifi” that it uses 802.11b – so the theoretical maximum data transfer from laptop to access point will be 11Mbps. I think this is rather short-sighted of GNER, as a single coach can hold something like 70 people… if even one quarter decided to all use the net at once, it would slow to a crawl. This will be particularly important in the future, with more and more IP-enabled devices.
However, the actual data transfer rate is far from the theoretical even of 802.11b. Downloading a file of ~ 8MB varied between 1KB/sec and 10KB/sec, depending on whether we were in a remote area surrounded by hills, or in a more open area. Unsurprisingly, at 1KB/s the net is practically unusable. It’s better at 10KB/s, but still not ideal – that is only just over double regular 56K dialup…
Carrying out the speed test at ADSLGuide as we were passing near Dunbar revealed an approximate speed of 35.5Kbps and upstream of 14.9Kbps – Hmhh….
My conclusions are very much the same as before – if you need internet access on the go, it works and works reasonably well. In patches – noticeably rural and hilly areas – the service slows down considerably, but it still suffices for basic web browsing and other similar tasks, Don’t even think of doing any truly high-bandwidth tasks – it’s not worth it. Also, it is still best value for long journeys, or when included with an advance booking First Class ticket.
Popularity: 58% [?]
Print
Entries (RSS)